A Test of Principles: US Foreign Policy at a Crossroads Over Taiwan

U.S. foreign policy is at a crossroads, facing a fundamental test of its principles over the issue of Taiwan. A demand from China for the Trump administration to “oppose” Taiwanese independence is forcing a choice between upholding a long-standing commitment to a democratic partner and accommodating a powerful authoritarian rival.
The demand seeks to replace the more nuanced U.S. stance of “not supporting” independence. This phrase has allowed the U.S. to adhere to its “One-China” policy while still maintaining robust unofficial ties with Taiwan. A shift to “oppose” would signal an abandonment of this principled balance in favor of a more pragmatic, and many would say cynical, alignment with Beijing.
This test of principles is occurring as the U.S. and China negotiate the terms of their future relationship. The inclusion of Taiwan’s status in these talks has raised concerns that the Trump administration’s transactional approach may lead it to prioritize economic gains over democratic values and security commitments.
The administration’s response will be a powerful statement about the nature of American leadership in the 21st century. Will the U.S. continue to stand, however ambiguously, with democracies under pressure, or will it cede ground to authoritarian powers in the pursuit of its own narrowly defined interests?
For Taiwan, the outcome of this test is of vital importance. The island has built a vibrant democracy in the shadow of a constant threat from its giant neighbor. A change in U.S. policy would not only be a betrayal of principle but would also have a direct and negative impact on the security and freedom of its 23 million people.